Published by Oil Change International & Friends of the Earth U.S.
Our new report “At a Crossroads: Assessing G20 and MDB international energy finance ahead of stop funding fossils pledge deadline” looks at G20 country and MDB traceable international public finance for fossil fuels from 2019-2021 and finds they are still backing at least USD 55 billion per year in oil, gas, and coal projects. This is a 35% drop compared to previous years (2016-2018), but still, almost twice the support provided for clean energy, which averaged only $29 billion per year. The research highlights that greatly increased international public finance for clean energy is the solution to the energy crisis, not more fossil investments. If all G20 countries and MDBs shift their fossil support to clean, this would nearly triple clean energy finance to $85 billion.
The report analyzes finance from OCI’s open-access database, Public Finance for Energy Database (energyfinance.org), which has been updated alongside the release of this report. It tracks financial flows to fossil fuels and clean energy from G20 bilateral development finance institutions (DFIs), export finance agencies (ECAs), and the multilateral development banks (MDBs).
The report has been endorsed by: 350.org, AboveGround, African Climate Reality Project, Arab Watch Coalition, Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD), BankTrack, Big Shift Global, Both ENDS, Bretton Woods Project, CEE Bankwatch Network, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for International Environmental Law, Climate Finance Group for Latin America and the Caribbean (GFLAC), Environmental Defence Canada, Friends of the Earth Japan, Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JACSES), Jubilee Australia Research Centre, Just Finance International, Justiça Ambiental, Kiko Network, Korean Federation for Environmental Movements (KFEM), Legambiente, Les Amis de la Terre France, Market Forces, Milieudefensie/FoE Netherlands, Powershift Africa, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, ReCommon, Recourse, Solutions for Our Climate, Stand.earth, Trend Asia, Urgewald, and WALHI / FOE Indonesia.
From 2019 to 2021, G20 countries and the major multilateral development banks (MDBs) provided at least USD 55 billion per year in international public finance for oil, gas, and coal. This fossil fuel finance was almost two times more than their support for clean energy, which averaged only $29 billion per year.
This support directly counters G20 countries’ commitment to align financial flows to 1.5 degrees Celsius (°C) under the Paris Agreement, as well as their 2009 commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. This international public finance has an outsized impact on global energy systems, because it can offer government-backed credit ratings, is often provided at below-market rates, comes with large research and technical capacity, and signals broader government priorities. All of this helps make a project a less risky and more attractive investment. Right now, G20 countries and MDBs are overwhelmingly using their international public finance to prop up fossil fuel companies and prolong the fossil fuel era.
However, there is some new momentum to reverse these flows and use international public finance institutions to instead support a globally just energy transition. Following a wave of commitments to bar international coal finance that began in 2013, 34 countries and 5 institutions signed a joint commitment in 2021 to restrict support for oil and gas as well. The Statement on International Public Support for the Clean Energy Transition (hereafter “Glasgow Public Finance Statement”), is a joint commitment made at the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in November 2021 to end direct international public finance support for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and instead prioritize public finance for clean energy. The signatories of this commitment include some of the largest historic providers of international public finance for fossil fuels, including G20 members Canada, Germany, Italy, the United States, and France. If all signatories follow through on their commitment, this would shift at least $28 billion a year out of fossil fuels and into clean energy, which would help shift even larger sums of public and private money. Much greater financial flows from high-income countries to lower-income countries are urgently needed for clean energy as well as debt cancellation, climate finance, and loss and damage compensation to ensure a globally just energy transition. Still, the Glasgow Statement represents a potentially transformative starting point.
Using Oil Change International’s Public Finance for Energy Database (with all data available at energyfinance.org), this briefing adds new figures for 2021, building on past reports Talk is Cheap, Still Digging, and Past Last Call, which covered trends from 2013 to 2020. We cover the energy project finance of G20 export credit agencies (ECAs), G20 development finance institutions (DFIs), and the major multilateral development banks (MDBs). It is important to note these figures are underestimated due to large gaps in public reporting. We aim to capture indirect fossil fuel support through financial intermediation and policy-based lending throughout, but these flows are especially opaque and so they are particularly underreported.
Our analysis shows that:
- Fossil fuels received at least $55 billion annually between 2019 and 2021, almost double the support for clean energy. This is a decrease from the annual average of $86 billion a year for fossil fuels between 2016 and 2018. However, it is still 1.9 times greater than the support clean energy received, $29 billion a year between 2019 and 2021.
- International public finance for clean energy has remained largely stagnant. Finance for clean energy increased only slightly from an annual average of $27 billion between 2016 and 2018 to $29 billion between 2019 and 2021, instead of growing exponentially as is needed to support a globally just energy transition.This means that initial decreases in trackable fossil fuel support have not yet led to a clear shift to clean energy support.
- 53% of known international public finance for fossil fuels flowed to fossil gas projects between 2019 and 2021. This $30 billion a year is larger than what any other energy type received from 2019 to 2021, and greater than all clean energy finance. In comparison, coal received $5.9 billion a year and the aggregated “oil and gas” category $13 billion.
- ECAs were the worst public finance actors, providing seven times more support for fossil fuels than clean energy – at least $34 billion per year for fossil fuels and just $4.7 billion for clean energy.
- An estimated 27% of the recent drop in fossil fuel finance is due to new fossil fuel exclusion policies. The decrease for 2019 to 2021 in fossil support was driven by a near halving of support in 2021 from the previous three years. 27% of this 2021 drop is traceable to fossil fuel exclusion policies from the UK and European Investment Bank (EIB) coming fully into effect, along with coal power exclusions from China and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Export Credit Arrangement, demonstrating that these commitments can bring material shifts. However, the rest of the decrease in 2021 does not necessarily mark progress — 53% of the shift can already be categorized as very likely temporary due to early 2022 data or decreases in data availability from specific institutions, and the remainder had no clear driver.
Annual G20 and MDB public finance for fossil fuels, clean energy, and other energy, 2013-2021, in USD billions
At the country level, we find that:
- Japan, Canada, Korea, and China again provided the most direct international public finance for fossil fuels between 2019 and 2021, providing an annual average of $10.6 billion, $8.5 billion, $7.3 billion, and $6.7 billion, respectively. These worst offenders have remained in the top position for the entire 2013 to 2021 dataset.
- France, Brazil, and Germany provided the most known public finance for clean energy through their international public finance institutions between 2019 and 2021, providing an annual average of $2.8 billion, $2.5 billion, and $2.2 billion, respectively.
- Most fossil fuel finance flowed from wealthy countries to other wealthy countries. Of the top 15 recipients, Mozambique was the only low-income country and 12 were high- or upper-middle-income countries.
- Renewable energy finance was also overwhelmingly concentrated in wealthy countries. A staggering 75% of all clean energy finance from G20 institutions flowed within the G20 instead of flowing to lower-income countries in the Global South and supporting a globally just energy transition.
- Seven of the 17 major financing signatories to the Glasgow Public Finance Statement have published new policies ruling out all or most fossil support. The United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, European Investment Bank (EIB), France, Belgium, and Finland have policies or policy proposals that fully or largely meet this commitment to shift direct international fossil fuel support to clean energy by the end of 2022 (Box 2). G20 countries Canada, the United States, Germany, and Italy are the four largest fossil financiers signed on to the statement without new policies as of publication. Oil Change International is tracking further implementation of fossil exclusion policies for all G20 countries, Glasgow signatory countries, and MDBs at energyfinance.org.
Top 15 G20 countries for international public finance for fossil fuels compared to renewable energy, annual average 2019-2021, USD billions
As part of doing their fair share to limit warming to 1.5°C and ensure a livable future, G20 governments and the MDBs they control must:
- Implement whole-of-government policies (or whole-of-institution policies in the case of MDBs) to immediately end new public direct and indirect finance for oil, gas, and coal projects. Both internationally and at home.
- Rapidly scale up support for clean energy, energy efficiency, just transition plans, and energy access, in line with an equitable pathway to 1.5°C and without reliance on unproven negative emission technologies. To avoid deepening inequalities, these projects must be implemented with strong human rights due diligence, free, prior and informed consent, and planning processes that are inclusive of and take leadership from local governments, workers, communities, civil society organizations (CSOs), and trade unions.
- Engage in targeted diplomacy to end public finance for fossil fuels internationally, including through joining or encouraging other countries to join the list of signatories of the Glasgow pledge to end international public finance for fossil fuels and supporting the adoption of oil and gas export finance restrictions at the OECD.
- Wealthy countries must provide their fair share of debt cancellation, climate finance and loss and damage support to countries in the Global South. This will allow for the rapid scale-up of clean energy and other climate solutions.
- Reform their public reporting to ensure it is transparent and timely.
We must end financing fossil fuels. World/people/land/air/ water depend on this.
It is time to make difficult choices and loosen our resilience on fossil fuels.
Engage in targeted diplomacy to end public finance for fossil fuels internationally, including through joining or encouraging other countries to join the list of signatories of the Glasgow pledge to end international public finance for fossil fuels and supporting the adoption of oil and gas export finance restrictions at the OECD.
The print media everywhere must publicize these findings more, as a way to push for change.
Comments are closed.