For an industry that prides itself on precision engineering and drilling, fracking is a brutal technique with unforeseen consequences.

The oil industry is trying to argue that fracking which exploits shale gas is a “game changer” that will guarantee energy security for years to come.

But the industry already faces growing public opposition due to water contamination around drilling sights, made infamous in the film Gasland, but it now stands accused of something much greater: actually causing earthquakes.

The controversial drilling technique has now been halted near Blackpool in North West England pending investigation into possible connection with 2 small earthquakes in the area.

An earthquake last Friday occurred at the same time that the energy company Cuadrilla Resources was injecting fluids to blast apart the rocks under Blackpool.

Now earthquake experts from the British Geological Survey (BGS) have said that the 1.5 magnitude quake last week was similar to a 2.3 earthquake in April in the same area and that both may be linked to fracking.

“It seems quite likely that they are related,” argues Dr. Brian Baptie from the BGS. “We had a couple of instruments close to the site and they show that both events were close to the site and at a shallow depth.”

Cuadrilla is trying to spin the “responsible” line by arguing that it has only “voluntarilly” suspended drilling.

“We’ve suspended drilling because there was an incident that the BGS recorded. We were aware of it because we have our own monitoring equipment on the site. We are now compiling a report with the BGS and Keele University. It was entirely our decision to suspend operations. We see it as an appropriate and responsible thing to do.”

Although neither of the earthquakes caused any structural damage, the fact that this type of drilling can have this effect will be a real worry for communities living near by.

Local Green Party organiser Philip Mitchell said: “The sense of local unease has increased further since reports of a second earthquake in the area close to the drilling at Singleton and Weeton. That has led people to question whether there is indeed a link between fracking and earthquakes.”

The shockwaves of what is happening around Blackpool will not only be felt in the UK. Opposition to fracking is growing internationally.

In the US, Michael Passoff, a senior strategist of the CSR programme of As You Sow, the shareholder activist, argues “There are a lot of red flags” for investors with fracking.

There are those within the industry that argue that public confidence will be key for this technology to succeed. So if you add earthquakes to poisoned and polluted water, the industry has a real battle on its hands.

Indeed, Andrew Logan, oil and gas director for Ceres, the investor network for environmental and social issues, argues: “It’s now becoming clear the industry is losing the public relations battle.”


  • It is clear while Germany dumps Nuclear Plants and focuses on Solar, my State of New Mexico, an oil and gas producing state like Oklahoma, Texas and Louisiana all are fair game to exploration. Why is it that Germany can protect their small country, about the size of New Mexico with 50x the population and we have so much sun here in Texas but that is irrelevant. Remember that New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle have a limited amount of water. Can you imagine the impact on New Mexico if the Rio Grande were considered unsafe for drinking and irrigation??? We would quickly be down to 49 states.

    Stephen Blanco

  • Didn’t anyone think it was a bit odd that the deepest well in the gulf of mexico (which blew) reached it drill depth right around the same time as the quake in Haiti?

    Somehow I can’t believe that there is no link between extracting oil and gas out of the deep parts of our earth without that release of pressure causing plates to shift etc. If every action has a re-action, then it seems that this could be possible.

  • There is something that is being overlooked. Scientists tell us that the earths atmosphere has a finite amount of water…what we have was here from the beginning…and we can’t make more.. Now..if this process is sooo clean then why do they need to inject the waste water into the ground? And where does it go? If it stays there will this not remove that water from our atmosphere? If it doesn’t stay there, where does it go?

Comments are closed.