Oil Change International

Exposing the true costs of fossil fuels

Posts in extreme energy

  • BOCC_v3_FB_fixed

    Banking on Climate Change: Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2017

    Big banks’ business as usual is killing the climate. From 2014 to 2016, big banks around the world poured $290 billion into extreme fossil fuel companies and failed to respect human rights.
  • C: Greenpeace International

    Exxon “Enters No Man’s Land”

    The world’s largest listed oil company, Exxon, announced on Friday it was going to have to cut its reported proved reserves by just under a fifth. It is the biggest reserve revision in the history of the oil industry.
  • shorting_the_climate1

    Shorting the Climate: Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2016

    In the past three years, the North American and European commercial and investment banking sector has engaged in fossil fuel financing practices that are deeply at odds with the global climate agreement reached at COP 21 last December.
  • C: Ed Schipul

    Trans Mountain pipeline is “final harpoon” for endangered killer whales

    At the beginning of last week, environmentalists celebrated when the largest energy infrastructure company in North America, Kinder Morgan, pulled the plug on its controversial natural gas pipeline which had been proposed through parts of Massachusetts and Southern New Hampshire, called NorthEast Energy Direct.
  • Syncrude Oil Operations in Alberta Tar Sands

    Tar Sands Companies “Selling Crown Jewels” to Survive

    Desperate times mean desperate measures. Something has to give. With no end in sight to the low oil price, Canadian tar sands companies are having to sell what are being described as their “jewels in the crown” in order just to survive.
  • Utah tar sands

    Controversial Utah Tar Sands Mine “Put on Hold”

    Every day the low oil price is causing more pain for the oil and gas industry and no company or region is immune from the damage being caused.
  • Arctic

    Deconstructing Shell’s “Memories of the Future”

    For a while now a growing number of people have been asking a series of pertinent questions about Shell’s Arctic drilling operations, which could probably be boiled down to this: Why would the global oil giant risk billions of dollars of its own money, irreparable damage to a pristine environment, as well as exacerbate climate change by drilling in the Arctic for oil that we can never afford to burn?
  • Syncrude Aurora Oil Sands Mine, Canada.

    Risky Business: tar sands investment in a carbon constrained world

    When oil prices crashed late last year, the high-cost and capital intensive tar sands sector took a hit. The industry had already been showing signs of weakness with underperforming stocks, project cancellations, and serious concerns about market access. But low oil prices have driven a whole new level of cost cutting and project delays.
  • Frozen Future: the gaps in Shell’s Arctic spill response

    Shell is currently moving its drilling rigs to Seattle in anticipation of resuming its US offshore Arctic drilling programme in July. However, it is far from clear that Shell has adequate physical or financial plans to deal with the impacts of a major oil spill in this remote region.
  • Frozen Future: Shell and the US Offshore Arctic

    Oil Change International, Greenpeace, and Platform – February 2015 Download Briefing On 29 January 2015, Royal Dutch Shell confirmed that it intends, subject to regulatory approval, to resume its US Arctic drilling programme at a cost for 2015 of at least $1bn. To date, Shell’s Arctic programme has been a failure despite capital expenditure in...
    Continue reading 'Frozen Future: Shell and the US Offshore Arctic'.
  • Archive by Month

  • Archive by Category

  • Archive by Tags