Oil Change International

Exposing the true costs of fossil fuels

Meanwhile in Africa its rip-offs and resource wars ..

DRC_A5_2.2_consAs the world watches and waits for the British company BP to stop the ecological disaster unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, you would be forgiven for forgetting that elsewhere round the globe the oil industry is just getting on with it.

Away from the glare of the cameras, there is the routine business of contracts being signed, wells drilled, and oil found.

There is the routine downside to the oil business:  the communities and ecosystems which are impacted, and countless other leaks and spills happening that never make the radar of the media.

The media has only appetite for one bad news oil story at a time: And at the moment that is BP.

But here is another one being perpetrated by other British oil companies: this time in the Congo. Its far less obvious, far less explosive than the Gulf but the situation there is equally as grave, just in different ways.

A new report from the oil industry analysts, Platform looks at leaked oil contracts that will be used in this unstable African country.

Remember it was Platform that blew the lid on the devious and dirty contracts in Iraq called Production Sharing Contracts (PDAs) that essentially gave much of the power to the international oil companies rather than Iraq.

Well the same type of contracts are going to be used in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Confidential oil contracts held by UK companies Tullow and Heritage in the DRC “reveal the danger of economic rip-off and rights abuses in one of Africa’s most unstable countries”, according to Platform.

Tullow Oil and Heritage signed a contract with the DRC in 2006, near Lake Albert. The status of that contract is now disputed by both sides since the Ministry of Energy appeared to annul it in October 2007, ahead of reassigning the main block in 2008 to a consortium led by South African company called Divine Inspiration

As the dispute between Tullow/Heritage and Divine Inspiration comes to a head, the contract terms have been released for the first time. Platform’s analysis compares revenues delivered by two competing contracts, revealing that:

* Both Tullow/Heritage & Divine/H Oil’s contracts guarantee excessive profits, at the expense of Congo’s poor
* Tullow’s contract terms reduce the Congolese take by around 15%, compared to Divine’s.
* If recognised, Tullow’s contract will cut Congolese government revenues by over $10 billion – a figure equivalent to the country’s entire national debt.

Despite this, Tullow and the British Embassy in Kinshasa have been lobbying hard for these contract terms. This represents a significant transfer of wealth from some of Africa’s poorest to British and Irish investors.

Platform Campaigner Mika Minio argues, ”The reality is that extracting Congolese crude will escalate resource wars, transfer wealth from Congo’s poorest to London’s richest, create new health problems for local communities, increase corruption and pollute the land, water and air..”

Pollute the land, water and air – just what BP is doing in the Gulf of Mexico.

Two different stories: same result.

That’s the oil industy for you…

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>