<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: Coal to Oil in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Oil Change International campaigns to expose the true costs of fossil fuels and facilitate the coming transition towards clean energy. We are dedicated to identifying and overcoming barriers to that transition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the Aussie</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1457461</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Aussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/#comment-1457461</guid>
		<description>Smart people the Chinese both America and Australia should be into this technology  as we both have heaps of coal and shale oil. We mothballed a new $100 million shale to oil refinery in Queensland because of pressure from Greenpeace.
I wonder who the biggest funder of Greenpeace is, not big oil of course? Even the Greens would have to admit it&#039;s safer for the environment to have a bit more Co2 in the air then ship oil half way around the world or have to depend on states that support terrorists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart people the Chinese both America and Australia should be into this technology  as we both have heaps of coal and shale oil. We mothballed a new $100 million shale to oil refinery in Queensland because of pressure from Greenpeace.<br />
I wonder who the biggest funder of Greenpeace is, not big oil of course? Even the Greens would have to admit it&#8217;s safer for the environment to have a bit more Co2 in the air then ship oil half way around the world or have to depend on states that support terrorists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baiyao</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1036759</link>
		<dc:creator>baiyao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/#comment-1036759</guid>
		<description>I work in this refinery!
 it has been started successfully in 2008.Direct liquefaction has lower dioxide emmissions than indirect liquefaction which has build in South Africa XD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in this refinery!<br />
 it has been started successfully in 2008.Direct liquefaction has lower dioxide emmissions than indirect liquefaction which has build in South Africa XD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Crawford</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-492298</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/#comment-492298</guid>
		<description>Seems like a great idea, it is a great idea, the reason the chinese are doin it is because they don&#039;t give a damn about emmisions or the enviroment.  The process to change coal into fuel lets out alot of carbon dioxide, alot more than traditional oil refineries let out making gasoline, however, american companies are working hard to develop new technologies to reduce the carbon dioxide emmissions, they are just lacking funds, and our gov. isn&#039;t helping them out much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a great idea, it is a great idea, the reason the chinese are doin it is because they don&#8217;t give a damn about emmisions or the enviroment.  The process to change coal into fuel lets out alot of carbon dioxide, alot more than traditional oil refineries let out making gasoline, however, american companies are working hard to develop new technologies to reduce the carbon dioxide emmissions, they are just lacking funds, and our gov. isn&#8217;t helping them out much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Deans</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-482756</link>
		<dc:creator>William Deans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/#comment-482756</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Rowell:

Stupid????  If you could turn 3.5 units of lead into 1 unit of gold would you do it?  Oil is black gold and coal is as cheap as dirt.  This is why America is complaining about its economy while China is experiencing double digit growth.  Our political convictions and culture are getting in the way of progress and ultimately we all suffer for it.

William Deans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Rowell:</p>
<p>Stupid????  If you could turn 3.5 units of lead into 1 unit of gold would you do it?  Oil is black gold and coal is as cheap as dirt.  This is why America is complaining about its economy while China is experiencing double digit growth.  Our political convictions and culture are getting in the way of progress and ultimately we all suffer for it.</p>
<p>William Deans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-416891</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/09/17/china-coal-to-oil-in-2008/#comment-416891</guid>
		<description>Better than buying it at $200.00 a barrel... and paying $10.00 a gallon... aren&#039;t you a moron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better than buying it at $200.00 a barrel&#8230; and paying $10.00 a gallon&#8230; aren&#8217;t you a moron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

