<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study Counters Climate Sceptics’ Main Argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://priceofoil.org/2007/07/11/new-study-counters-climate-sceptics%e2%80%99-main-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/07/11/new-study-counters-climate-sceptics%e2%80%99-main-argument/</link>
	<description>Oil Change International campaigns to expose the true costs of oil and facilitate the coming transition towards clean energy. We are dedicated to identifying and overcoming political barriers to that transition.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://priceofoil.org/2007/07/11/new-study-counters-climate-sceptics%e2%80%99-main-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-87652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priceofoil.org/2007/07/11/new-study-counters-climate-sceptics%e2%80%99-main-argument/#comment-87652</guid>
		<description>Talk about a straw man argument.  No one who supports the solar forcing hypothesis talks about the suns output.  It's about sunspot activity, cosmic rays, and cloud formation.  Thanks to the uncanny correlation between sunspot activity and the historical temperature record, enough evidence led to the formation of the CLOUD project, currently being conducted at the CERN complex in Geneva, Switzerland.  It takes a lot of weight to get permission to use a $2.4 bn particle accelerator to conduct a five year experiment.  Until those results are in the science is not settled.  
What's unfathomable is why you freaks WANT Man to be solely responsible for global warming.  You really would be upset if it turns out that this is just a natural occurrence like it's always been.  Your frantic efforts to support your hypothesis at all costs completely undermines your credibility.  It is precisely this behavior that will prevent you from ever gaining enough support from the general public as is evidenced from opinion pols that are coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about a straw man argument.  No one who supports the solar forcing hypothesis talks about the suns output.  It&#8217;s about sunspot activity, cosmic rays, and cloud formation.  Thanks to the uncanny correlation between sunspot activity and the historical temperature record, enough evidence led to the formation of the CLOUD project, currently being conducted at the CERN complex in Geneva, Switzerland.  It takes a lot of weight to get permission to use a $2.4 bn particle accelerator to conduct a five year experiment.  Until those results are in the science is not settled.<br />
What&#8217;s unfathomable is why you freaks WANT Man to be solely responsible for global warming.  You really would be upset if it turns out that this is just a natural occurrence like it&#8217;s always been.  Your frantic efforts to support your hypothesis at all costs completely undermines your credibility.  It is precisely this behavior that will prevent you from ever gaining enough support from the general public as is evidenced from opinion pols that are coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
